Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ThisGirl Discography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to ThisGirl. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 15:29, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ThisGirl Discography

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Kittybrewster ☎ 19:43, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 19:50, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - see my comment here on the worthiness of the band to survive in WP. The articles for this group need some work and a few sources can be dug up with a little work. However, I admit that there is little to go on for this particular discography page, especially under the protocols of the WP:DISCOGRAPHY project (of which I am a member). The information in this discog article can be merged to the artist page, which I recommend keeping based on my comment on the AfD over there. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:55, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to ThisGirl per Doomsdayer520. Cnilep (talk) 00:16, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 02:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Keep. The band are notable, so a discography is appropriate. Merge may be best.--Michig (talk) 09:56, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to ThisGirl per above. The band appears notable, so I don't believe deleting this would be the best option. That said, this page is completely unsourced (except for two YouTube videos), and there is very little material to source, as no albums or songs appear to have charted anywhere. The group has few releases to their credit, and since they split up four years ago, that figures to remain the case. I feel that a merge to the artist's main article seems most appropriate here. Gongshow ^Talk 17:51, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.